Recent research on necessary precautions when feeding dogs this diet
Commercial and home-prepared raw meat-based diets (RMBDs) have grown in popularity over the past decade. Supporters of RMBDs claim they are a safe, natural way to promote animal wellness and boast about the nutritional superiority to common diets. These claims are made without long-term supportive evidence and largely ignore the potentially life-threatening consequences to pets and their human caregivers when contaminated RMBDs are fed. The American Animal Hospital Association,1 American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA),2 and Canadian Veterinary Medical Association3 have adopted statements discouraging the inclusion of raw or undercooked animal-source protein in dog and cat diets.
Several studies have revealed important concerns about nutritional imbalances when RMBDs are not formulated properly, health risks to animals, and public health concerns. Manufacturers of raw or cooked commercial pet foods employ a wide variety of quality-control standards.
A 2001 US study4 showed the home-prepared and commercial RMBDs tested had multiple nutritional imbalances, including a calcium-to-phosphorus ratio of 0.20, vitamin A and E concentrations below the minimum detectable value, and a vitamin D concentration nearly twice the AAFCO maximum amount. A case report showed5 a growing dog being fed an RMBD resulted in vitamin D–dependent rickets type I and nutritional secondary hyperparathyroidism. In a recent study in Europe,6 investigators calculated amounts of 12 nutrients (eg, calcium, phosphorus, and vitamin A) for 95 homemade RMBDs being fed to dogs, as reported by the owners. In that study, (60%) diets had major nutritional imbalances.
Raw meats are frequently contaminated with microorganisms such as E coli, Salmonella spp, Clostridium spp, Campylobacter spp, Listeria spp, and parasites such as T gondii. Several studies7-10 have found that dogs eating RMBDs are at risk for shedding Salmonella spp in their feces. The environmental contamination caused by the shedding of these organisms after pets ingest them raises a risk for infection of humans. A recent study11 revealed a Salmonella prevalence rate of 21% for 166 commercial RMBDs, and 18 Salmonella serotypes isolated from those samples were resistant to 12 of 16 antimicrobials tested.
To ensure the safety of other pets and veterinary staff, authors of an article in the Journal of the AVMA12 recommend veterinarians establish procedures for pets that eat RMBDs because of the risk of bacterial and parasitic contamination. They also recommend counseling owners who feed a RMBD on the risk to themselves and documenting this conversation in the medical record. These nutritional deficiencies in RMBDs can lead to long-term complications if not detected early.
Additional studies are needed to provide information about the long-term health effects of RMBDs for dogs and cats. In the absence of these reported studies, an animal eating a home-prepared diet should undergo an annual physical examination and comprehensive health screening.12 This includes a serum biochemical analysis (with thyroxine concentrations), hematologic analysis, and urinalysis.
Caitlee Callahan is a 2023 PharmD candidate at the University of Connecticut
References