One veterinarian queries an ethics expert and Facebook readers seize the chance to respond.
The cost to the clinic remained the same. Refund the client whose pet the medication was ordered for, and charge the client whose pet will use the drug. If the first client chooses to decline the refund and donate the product to the second client, so be it. Let the client "pay it forward."
- Linda Sisti
What Linda Sisti said, exactly. I don't see a huge conflict here, honestly. Everyone should be happy the drug is on hand and available to the patient who needs it. The cost should be billed to the owner of that patient.
- Mike Walker
I'll charge the same cost as for the first patient and keep the refund in cash to give for the original client, unless he donates it, (Happening very often regarding the loss of a beloved friend) and then, the money goes to a shelter.
- Sarahí López
Answer:
A professional relationship with a veterinarian allows a pet owner to make what are often life-and-death decisions about their pets without fear of the veterinarian having ulterior motives. To accomplish this, the veterinarian must be open and honest about all facets of the pet's veterinary care.
In this situation, the patient died before receiving one of the medications ordered for treatment. If the client was billed for this medication and it was not used for the patient, then the fee should be refunded. The obligation of the veterinarian would be to contact the client and inform him or her of the situation and refund any money paid for unused medication.
Most drug distributors will credit the return of an unopened, non-expired medication. There may be a minor restocking fee, which can be passed on to the pet owner. In this case, a second patient was in need of this drug and the owner should be willing to pay the fee to treat the pet. The veterinarian has suffered no financial loss, the patient has been served, and the open and honest veterinarian-client relationship has been maintained.
Coloradans vote yes to midlevel practitioner proposal
November 13th 2024Despite more than 200 veterinary industry organizations, professional associations, and veterinary professionals publicly opposing it, the veterinary professional associate position will be implemented in the next few years following a public vote
Read More
Proposed midlevel role poses unacceptable risks
October 30th 2024Proposals that would create a new midlevel practitioner (MLP) role raise serious concerns about the future of quality care for veterinary patients. Sometimes referred to as a veterinary professional associate (VPA), their duties would overlap those of a veterinarian and veterinary technician.
Read More